Re: what's up with gcc 3.3 and 3.4 ?

["Steve M. Robbins" <steven.robbins@videotron.ca>]

On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 09:51:02PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins writes:
> > Package ccmalloc explicitly build-depends on all supported C++ 
> > compilers because it builds a specific module for each.
> > 
> > Two bugs have been filed against it suggesting that g++-3.3 (BTS
> > 343034) and g++-3.4 (BTS 342959) are on their way out.  Is that true?
> > 
> > I don't recall seeing any sort of official announcement about this.
> 
> what kind of official announcement do you need?

I've come to expect a note to a prominent place like -devel,
or -devel-announce.  The sort of thing we've seen for the
various transitions recently:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00001.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00002.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html


For instance, there was no mention in the release team plans for etch:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html

-Steve