[Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor
------- Comment #10 from ben at decadent dot org dot uk 2006-12-08 00:40 -------
Lawrence: Every class has a destructor. You're talking about classes that have
trivial destructors. Whether a non-virtual destructor is trivial or not has no
bearing on the fact that if an instance of a derived class is destroyed through
a pointer or reference to a base class with a non-virtual destructor, the
result is undefined behaviour.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Reply to: