[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#382414: closed by Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> (Re: Bug#382414: inflated alternatives priority)



> > The current behaviour breaks several java applications that need the
> > Sun Java runtime engine on a regular base.
> 
> the priorities are as discussed on debian-java. please don't file bugs
> on single packages.

Please point me to a discussion where it was decided to assign 1041
as priority for gcj and 41 as priority for a JVM which is actually
feature complete.

-- 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`     http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Reply to: