Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:09:20 +0200 with message-id <17685.34400.775145.270786@gargle.gargle.HOWL> and subject line Bug#383311: wish: update-alternatives entry for gcj has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: wish: update-alternatives entry for gcj
- From: João Batista <joao_mn_batista@portugalmail.pt>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:21:04 +0100
- Message-id: <20060816132104.5762.26281.reportbug@jblap>
Package: gcj Severity: wishlist It would be nice to have update-alternatives select a default version of gcj, similar to what happens with other packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.11-kanotix-up-1 Locale: LANG=pt_PT, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: João Batista <joao_mn_batista@portugalmail.pt>, 383311-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#383311: wish: update-alternatives entry for gcj
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:09:20 +0200
- Message-id: <17685.34400.775145.270786@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
- In-reply-to: <20060816132104.5762.26281.reportbug@jblap>
- References: <20060816132104.5762.26281.reportbug@jblap>
=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o?= Batista writes: > Package: gcj > Severity: wishlist > > It would be nice to have update-alternatives select a default version of > gcj, similar to what happens with other packages. there's no need for it. If you use the wrappers, you can point java/javac to the specific versions you do want to use.
--- End Message ---