[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#387561: libffi package is long since obsolete, but libffi4-dev could Conflict: with it

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:30:45PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> "Kevin B. McCarty" <kmccarty@Princeton.EDU> writes:
> > ...note that 2001 was before the release of woody.  This package is so
> > old that it shouldn't still be on anyone's system and Debian doesn't
> > actually need to support it.  (The submitter may want to check for
> > "Obsolete and locally created packages" in aptitude once in a while.)
> > I'm guessing libffi4-dev maintainers will just close this bug.
> This is incorrect reasoning.
> Old packages do not get automatically deleted, and there's no reason
> to think this one would have been.
> Thomas
I suppose from the version numbering the intent may have been to allow
multiple versions to coexist.  Unfortunately, it seems the latest one
and the very early one can't coexist, so I guess they need to

I don't know the dependency mechanism well enough to know whether a
simple conflict entry is sufficient to resolve the problem.


P.S. Since libffi is no longer on my system, I can't check what
category is was classified under.  I'm using apt-get rather than
aptitude, and the former is much less aggressive about culling
unneeded packages.  However, it appears that the previous version of
gnucash and supporting libs did require libffi--at least, removing
libffi required removing the old gnucash.

Reply to: