Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> On 18 August 2006 at 00:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | * John Schmidt <email@example.com> [2006-08-17 13:46]:
> | > Is there a way for me to instrument my code/system, etc to indicate
> | > where the big time sink is?
> | I'm not sure but I'll try to investigate.
> I didn't make that as clear as I wanted to in my last email -- but you could
> just compare the package build of RQuantLib on stable (where it should be few
> minutes) to testing (where it will be at least twice that). Not that much
> code in Quantlib or RQuantLib and you should get a quick feeling for how much
> g++ changed.
please identify the files, which take longer to build; it's known that
4.x is slower in some cases.