[Bug target/28490] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088
------- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-31 11:29 -------
This bug is also present in gcc 4.0 and 4.1 even though my original testcase
didn't expose it there. My new one does:
tbm@coconut0:~$ gcc-4.0 -c -O ecl-asdf.c
ecl-asdf.c: In function 'LC67traverse':
ecl-asdf.c:81: internal compiler error: in ia64_expand_move, at
config/ia64/ia64.c:1004
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see <URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs>.
tbm@coconut0:~$ gcc-4.1 -c -O ecl-asdf.c
ecl-asdf.c: In function 'LC67traverse':
ecl-asdf.c:81: internal compiler error: in ia64_expand_move, at
config/ia64/ia64.c:1052
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see <URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1/README.Bugs>.
Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccQbxgpQ.out file, please attach this to
your bugreport.
tbm@coconut0:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c -O ecl-asdf.c
ecl-asdf.c: In function 'LC67traverse':
ecl-asdf.c:81: internal compiler error: in ia64_expand_move, at
config/ia64/ia64.c:1088
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
This is with:
4.0.4 20060630
4.1.2 20060715
4.2.0 20060721
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|4.2.0 |4.0.3 4.1.1 4.2.0
Known to work|4.0.3 4.1.1 |3.3.6 3.4.6
Summary|[4.2 regression] ICE in |[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE
|ia64_expand_move, at |in ia64_expand_move, at
|config/ia64/ia64.c:1088 |config/ia64/ia64.c:1088
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Reply to: