--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: g++-4.0: template function returning nested class fails to compile when defined outside of its class
- From: "Frank B. Brokken" <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:39:45 +0200
- Message-id: <20060616083945.6958.32011.reportbug@suffix.rc.rug.nl>
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
The following code generates the g++ compiler error:
14: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion
before Outer
template <typename T>
class Outer
{
public:
class Inner
{
};
Inner get() const;
};
template <typename T>
Outer<T>::Inner
Outer<T>::get() const // <-- this is line 14
{
return Inner();
}
If the function get() is placed inside the template class Outer, no error is
reported. E.g.,
template <typename T>
class Outer
{
public:
class Inner
{
};
Inner get() const
{
return Inner();
}
};
An external definition compiles well if the class Inner is explicitly defined
as a template class (even though no template parameters are required). E.g.,
template <typename T>
class Outer
{
public:
template <typename U>
class Inner
{
};
Inner<T> get() const;
};
template <typename T>
Outer<T>::Inner<T>
Outer<T>::get() const
{
return Inner<T>();
}
Moreover, the first source, producing a compilation error with g++ was also
offered to the intel C++ compiler, where it compiled flawlessly. Here is a
transcript of the issued commands, illustrating the difference:
arnold@rc-429:~/programming/C++$ g++ -c -Wall demo1.cxx
demo1.cxx:14: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type
conversion before ?Outer?
arnold@rc-429:~/programming/C++$ icc -c -Wall demo1.cxx
arnold@rc-429:~/programming/C++$
My considerations for filing a bug report were:
* g++ produces a compilation error where icc doesn't;
* g++'s compilation error is only produced when the template function is
defined outside of its template class;
* the reported error message is rather cryptic, given the nature of the
source, suggesting confusion on the part of the compiler.
Of course, g++ might offer a more rigid implementation of the C++ standard at
this point. However, I couldn't find a clear indication that the external
function implementation violates the standard. Hence the bug report.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages g++-4.0 depends on:
ii gcc-4.0 4.0.3-3 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0.3-3 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.6-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libstdc++6-4.0-dev 4.0.3-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
g++-4.0 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---