[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#339495: marked as done (cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:04:21 +0200
with message-id <17583.62373.434133.223388@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#339495: cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: cpp-4.0-doc
Version: 4.0.2-3
Severity: minor

Hello,

you can see[1] that cpp support -O, -O[1-9], -Os options, and these
options are meanful. but this is not documented in man page[2] and
info[3].

man page belongs to cpp-4.0, need I clone this bug?

[1]
$ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep OPT
$ cpp -dM -O /dev/null | grep OPT
#define __OPTIMIZE__ 1
$ cpp -dM -Os /dev/null | grep OPT
#define __OPTIMIZE__ 1
#define __OPTIMIZE_SIZE__ 1
$ cpp -dM -O2 /dev/null | grep OPT
#define __OPTIMIZE__ 1

[2] /usr/share/man/man1/cpp-4.0.1.gz
[3] /usr/share/info/cpp-4.0.info.gz



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cpp-4.0-doc depends on:
ii  gcc-4.0-base                  4.0.2-3    The GNU Compiler Collection (base 

cpp-4.0-doc recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Falk wrote:
> I don't think these options are meaningful or should be documented.
> Why would you want to use them?

four months without feedback; closing the report.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: