[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#350688: gcc-2.95: FTBFS with new make



Thiemo Seufer writes:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr writes:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > > please send a fix. I do not intend to touch this code. it's fixed in
> > > > > the 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 packages.
> > > > 
> > > > Hello Matthias,
> > > > 
> > > > Daniel and Matt Krai provided a patch for this bug.
> > > > Do you plan to upload this package soon ?
> > > > 
> > > > In the alternative, would you consider the option of a NMU ?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks in advance fro your answer,
> > > 
> > > Please coordinate with Thiemo, he planned an upload this weekend.
> > 
> > I see a NMU by Steinar being rejected due to bad versions.
> > 
> > So how do we proceed from there ? Who is going to upload a fix ?
> 
> I'm preparing an upload of -25, sorry for the delay.

please could you add the unversioned chill symlinks for the binary and
the manpage. and adding a Replaces, Provides: chill? then we can drop
the dependency of gcc-defaults on gcc-2.95.

Falk, should we just remove the alpha binaries, or is there a chance
that we can build it again?

  Matthias



Reply to: