Bug#364600: ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448: could not split insn
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060419-1
ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448: could not split insn
> Automatic build of gnumeric_1.6.3-1 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.44
...
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I.. -I../.. -I../../src -I../../src/widgets -I../../src/dialogs -I../../src/tools -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgsf-1 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libgoffice-1 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprint-2.2 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprintui-2.2 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-module-2.0 -g -O2 -Wall -Wsign-compare -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -Wchar-subscripts -Wwrite-strings -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wnested-externs -Wmissing-noreturn -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-pointer-sign -MT colrow.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/colrow.Tpo -c ../../src/colrow.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/colrow.o
> ../../src/colrow.c: In function 'colrow_equal':
> ../../src/colrow.c:114: error: could not split insn
> (insn 89 48 49 ../../src/colrow.c:107 (set (reg:SI 9 9)
> (const_int 4261150720 [0xfdfc0000])) 262 {*movsi_internal1} (nil)
> (nil))
> ../../src/colrow.c:114: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> make[5]: *** [colrow.lo] Error 1
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Reply to: