Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: 361715@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1
From: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:37:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87hd5146r3.fsf@debian.org>
Reply-to: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>, 361715@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060410150906.GA14609@deprecation.cyrius.com> (Martin Michlmayr's message of "Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:09:06 +0200")
References: <20060409195901.EE6B5460DB@em64t.snowman.net> <[🔎] 20060409203153.GA2242@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 20060410150906.GA14609@deprecation.cyrius.com>

Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> writes:

> Yeah, I had an old file around that delta used instead.  Below is a
> new test case.  Falk, do you see this segfault?

Nope...

-- 
	Falk

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: [Bug tree-optimization/26626] [4.2 Regression] ICE in in add_virtual_operand
Next by Date: [Bug tree-optimization/27103] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have symbol_memory_tag in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466
Previous by thread: Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1
Next by thread: Processed: forwarded 361407
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread