On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:36:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Nick Lewycky writes: > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > thanks for the testcase, however I'm unable to reproduce the failure > > > with a recent unstable archive, nor do I see the apt-listchanges > > > failures. > > I can confirm the apt-listchanges failure here, running unstable. The > > only exceptional thing about my system that I think could be relevant is > > that I'm running a non-Debian kernel from kernel.org (2.6.15.6). > > The error message itself is being printed by ld.so, which belongs to the > > libc6 package. My libc6 version is "2.3.6-5". > > I've tried running the testcase with "LD_DEBUG=all" in the environment, > > but the output wasn't very illuminating (attached). Perhaps someone not > > showing symptoms can diff it against a run on their own system. > > Actually, valgrind screams with lots of errors in /lib/ld-2.3.6.so when > > running the testcase, or any other affected program. Hmm. That would > > explain its non-deterministic nature. Valgrind output also attached. > Aurelian Jarno pointed out the following: only reproducible with 2.4 > kernels or if you (re)move /lib/tls on a 2.6 kernel. > Officially we don't support 2.4 kernels anymore, whatever "deprecated" > means. > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00007.html We still have to support installing etch glibc on sarge kernels for upgrade purposes! -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature