[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#360479: steghide: FTBFS: error: 'VERSION' was not declared in this scope



reassign 360479 g++
thanks

I have now looked over the code and can not possibly find out that this is
a fault in the code. If someone can tell me what the problem is then I can
accept it but this have worked before and VERSION tag is found in config.h
which is included. I have even tried to explictly include the config.h file
directly without success.

Is throw an other kind of scope?

Regards,

// Ola

On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:25:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: steghide
> Version: 0.5.1-7
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..  -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\"   -O2 -W
> all -MT EmbData.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/EmbData.Tpo" \
>           -c -o EmbData.o `test -f 'EmbData.cc' || echo './'`EmbData.cc; \
>         then mv ".deps/EmbData.Tpo" ".deps/EmbData.Po"; \
>         else rm -f ".deps/EmbData.Tpo"; exit 1; \
>         fi
> EmbData.cc: In member function 'void EmbData::addBits(BitString)':
> EmbData.cc:107: error: 'VERSION' was not declared in this scope
> EmbData.cc: In member function 'BitString EmbData::getBitString()':
> EmbData.cc:343: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
> EmbData.cc: In member function 'std::string EmbData::stripDir(std::string)':
> EmbData.cc:368: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
> make[3]: *** [EmbData.o] Error 1
> 
> 
> 
> Kurt
> 
> 
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: