Falk Hueffner wrote: > the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes > it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? > Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get > something smaller? Then why does it work find with -finline-functions? It seems very obvious given the gdb output that somehow a constant function argument is being changed. What this has to do with glibc or memory management escapes me. As far as the test case, I'm not sure what I can remove -- the program is a fairly complete unit, and its size probably has something to do with the issue. -- Chris Howie http://www.chrishowie.com -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/IT d-(--) s:- a--->? C++(+++)$> UL++++ P++++$ L+++>++++ E--- W++ N o++ K? w--$ O M- V- PS--(---) PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5? X- R(+)>- tv-(--) b- DI+> D++ G>+++ e>++ h(--)>--- !r>+++ y->+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature