Re: GCC 4.1 in experimental / GCC for etch
Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Still open points are
> - GNAT maintainance. Supposed to be based on 4.1. The GNAT maintainer
> isn't a DD yet (after more than a year of GNAT maintainance in
> Debian I'm loosing trust in our NM process).
I'm that person. I started GNAT maintenance in July 2003, and I'm now
in the middle of the NM procedure, having passed P&P. I've also sent
my answers to T&S part I. May application manager, Alexander Wirth,
will be at FOSDEM this weekend, and I hope he'll attend my speech
where I'll talk about my work for Ada in Debian. I also hope we can
expedite the NM process during a face-to-face meeting :)
(Not CCing -release or -ports, keeping -gcc as this post has some
relevance to GCC maintenance).