[Bug c++/22551] [4.0/4.1 Regression] [ICE] in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3843

["mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

------- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-16 22:06 -------
The new switch2.C test is failing for me.  In fact, I'm not sure why we should
see overflow warnings on these expressions; isn't "0x80000000" INT_MIN?  In
that case, INT_MIN + 1 does not overflow, does it?  The C front end in GCC
3.4.x does not warn about the equivalent C program.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22551

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.