Bug#312367: marked as done (gcc-3.3: D support)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:19:58 +0200
with message-id <87fyrkrtzl.fsf@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#312367: D support
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 18:40:57 +0000
>From moonz@no-log.org Tue Jun 07 11:40:57 2005
Return-path: <moonz@no-log.org>
Received: from mx-out.tiscali.fr (mail.libertysurf.net) [213.36.80.91]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dfj0S-0006Ov-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:40:57 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (213.36.5.189) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026)
id 42A318CE0007FD7A; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:40:25 +0200
Message-ID: <42A318CE0007FD7A@mail08.pds.libertysurf.fr> (added by postmaster@libertysurf.fr)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Moonz <moonz@no-log.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gcc-3.3: D support
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:40:27 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-5
Severity: wishlist
GCC support the D language with GDC
(http://home.earthlink.net/~dvdfrdmn/d). Can the debian package be built
with GDC ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-6 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.3 1:3.3.6-5 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.6-5 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 312367-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 12:20:34 +0000
>From falk@debian.org Sun Oct 02 05:20:34 2005
Return-path: <falk@debian.org>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EM2pW-0004Ul-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 05:20:34 -0700
Received: from [84.59.228.175] (helo=juist)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EM2p1-0007Nw-00
for 312367-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:20:03 +0200
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.53)
id 1EM2ow-0000x8-SI
for 312367-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:19:58 +0200
To: 312367-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#312367: D support
From: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>
X-Face: "iUeUu$b*W_"w?tV83Y3*r:`rh&dRv}$YnZ3,LVeCZSYVuf[Gpo*5%_=/\_!gc_,SS}[~xZ
wY77I-M)xHIx:2f56g%/`SOw"Dx%4Xq0&f\Tj~>|QR|vGlU}TBYhiG(K:2<T^
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:19:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87fyrkrtzl.fsf@debian.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (cilantro, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: falk@debian.org
X-Sender: falk.hueffner@web.de
Delivered-To: 312367-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
there seems to be no work on a front end for 4.0 or newer, so at the
moment we cannot add this patch. Feel free to reopen when a new patch
exists.
--
Falk
Reply to: