Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #327301 to gcc-gnats as PR 24140

To: doko@debian.org
Cc: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>(gcc-4.0 #327301), debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org (#327301)
Subject: Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #327301 to gcc-gnats as PR 24140
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:18:15 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.112807130318118.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <E1ELGs9-0004Ib-5b@cachaca.net.local>
References: <E1ELGs9-0004Ib-5b@cachaca.net.local>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # submitted Debian report #327301 to gcc-gnats as PR 24140
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24140
> forwarded 327301 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24140
Bug#327301: gcc ICE when duplicate definitions of an inline function are present
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24140.

> retitle 327301 [PR 24140] [4.0 regression] ICE on duplicate definitions of an inline function
Bug#327301: gcc ICE when duplicate definitions of an inline function are present
Changed Bug title.

> tags 327301 + upstream
Bug#327301: [PR 24140] [4.0 regression] ICE on duplicate definitions of an inline function
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: [Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
Next by Date: [Bug c/24140] [4.0 regression] ICE on duplicate definitions of an inline function
Previous by thread: [Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
Next by thread: [Bug c/24140] [4.0 regression] ICE on duplicate definitions of an inline function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread