Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message
- To: gpk@kochanski.org
- Cc: 292961@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message
- From: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:13:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87acqo3ani.fsf@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>, 292961@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <41FED52D.9010109@gpk.wftp.org> (Greg Kochanski's message of "Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:02:37 +0000")
- References: <E1CvbXj-0003m3-9R@gpk.wftp.org> <87hdkxvg2h.fsf@debian.org> <41FE9CDC.1030904@gpk.wftp.org> <87brb5cmk2.fsf@debian.org> <41FEAED3.8050705@gpk.wftp.org> <877jltcjr0.fsf@debian.org> <41FEC967.6020201@gpk.wftp.org> <873bwhce1c.fsf@debian.org> <41FED52D.9010109@gpk.wftp.org>
Greg Kochanski <gpk@kochanski.org> writes:
>> Which seems like an acceptable error message. Unfortunately, it is
>> rather likely that this gets fixed in 3.3, too.
>
> How about this variant that defines inverse() ?
> [...]
Hmm. This seems like valid code, but g++ 3.3 still rejects it.
However, this is also fixed in 3.4.
--
Falk
Reply to: