Bug#341816: marked as done ([arm] as: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands)
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:32:59 +0100
with message-id <17304.49835.411037.704714@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#341816: [arm] as: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 11:36:07 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Dec 03 03:36:07 2005
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiVgV-0004c2-8p
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:36:07 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA15167
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:36:05 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C413F2B2
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:36:05 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 13650-29 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:36:04 +0100 (MET) 13810
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:36:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jB3Ba4gJ010962;
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:36:04 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[🔎] 17297.33572.435105.783549@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:36:04 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [arm] as: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: binutils,gcj-4.0
Version: 2.16.1cvs20051117-1
Severity: serious
the gcc-4.0 build from Nov 18 using binutils-2.16.1 did succeed, today's gcj-4.0 fails:
/build/buildd/gcj-4.0-4.0.2/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcj-4.0-4.0.2/build/gcc/ -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnu/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/build/buildd/gcj-4.0-4.0.2/src/boehm-gc/include -fexceptions -Iinclude -I././targ-include -I.//libc/include -O2 -g -O2 -fexceptions -Iinclude -I././targ-include -I.//libc/include -c ../../../src/boehm-gc/finalize.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/finalize.o
/tmp/ccjPZNH0.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccjPZNH0.s:1703: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands -- `swp r3,r5,[r3]'
/tmp/ccjPZNH0.s:2013: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands -- `swp r3,r4,[r3]'
/tmp/ccjPZNH0.s:2186: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands -- `swp r3,r5,[r3]'
make[5]: *** [finalize.lo] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcj-4.0-4.0.2/build/arm-linux-gnu/boehm-gc'
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341816-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 23:33:03 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Thu Dec 08 15:33:03 2005
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkVG2-00038Y-O7
for 341816-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:33:03 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA01730
for <341816-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:33:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C21FF2B3
for <341816-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:33:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 27818-03 for <341816-done@bugs.debian.org>;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:32:59 +0100 (MET) 13933
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <341816-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:32:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jB8NWx2q010433;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:32:59 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17304.49835.411037.704714@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:32:59 +0100
To: 341816-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#341816: [arm] as: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 17297.33572.435105.783549@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <[🔎] 17297.33572.435105.783549@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 4.0.2-5j2
fixed in 4.0.2-5j2
Reply to: