Bug#180486: marked as done (gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher)
Your message dated Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:23:36 +0200
with message-id <87mzmo6087.fsf@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#180486: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2003 19:00:11 +0000
>From camm@voltaire.debian.org Mon Feb 10 13:00:10 2003
Return-path: <camm@voltaire.debian.org>
Received: from voltaire.debian.org [66.93.61.168]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18iJA2-0003Rc-00; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:00:10 -0600
Received: from camm by voltaire.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 18iJ9v-0004lw-00; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:00:03 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:00:03 -0500
Message-Id: <E18iJ9v-0004lw-00@voltaire.debian.org>
Sender: Camm Maguire <camm@voltaire.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2-1
Severity: normal
When compiling GCL, the produced lisp image segfaults early on
iwhen using -O2 or higher. All is fine with -O, or with full
optimization using earlier gcc versions on this platform.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux voltaire 2.4.19-powerpc-smp #1 SMP Mon Sep 9 09:11:02 EDT 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gcc-3.2 depends on:
ii binutils 2.13.90.0.18-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.2 1:3.2.2-1 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.2-1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.2.2-1 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 180486-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 21:24:07 +0000
>From falk@debian.org Wed Sep 07 14:24:07 2005
Return-path: <falk@debian.org>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ED7Op-0007m0-00; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:24:07 -0700
Received: from [82.82.219.39] (helo=juist)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.105 #314)
id 1ED7OK-0007AP-00
for 180486-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:23:36 +0200
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ED7OK-0004kx-G0
for 180486-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:23:36 +0200
To: 180486-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#180486: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher
From: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>
X-Face: "iUeUu$b*W_"w?tV83Y3*r:`rh&dRv}$YnZ3,LVeCZSYVuf[Gpo*5%_=/\_!gc_,SS}[~xZ
wY77I-M)xHIx:2f56g%/`SOw"Dx%4Xq0&f\Tj~>|QR|vGlU}TBYhiG(K:2<T^
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:23:36 +0200
Message-ID: <87mzmo6087.fsf@debian.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (cilantro, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: falk@debian.org
X-Sender: falk.hueffner@web.de
Delivered-To: 180486-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
since there has been no feedback for this bug for >3 months, I'm
closing this bug.
--
Falk
Reply to: