On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:45:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > By any chance, can you provide a reference to the C spec that shows > gcc's current behavior is valid? Given that traceroute is among the > programs that breaks under gcc-4.0, it seems to me that the assumption > that it's safe to use memcpy this way has been around for quite some > time. 6.3.2.3, paragraph 7. Bastian -- "... freedom ... is a worship word..." "It is our worship word too." -- Cloud William and Kirk, "The Omega Glory", stardate unknown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature