[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#321883: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on libcairo0.5.1-dev)



Your message dated Mon, 8 Aug 2005 02:12:46 +0200
with message-id <20050808001246.GE4586@chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
and subject line Bug#321883: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on libcairo0.5.1-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 23:06:32 +0000
>From mbanck@gmx.net Sun Aug 07 16:06:32 2005
Return-path: <mbanck@gmx.net>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E1tj6-0001oT-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:34:40 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Aug 2005 22:34:08 -0000
Received: from ppp-62-245-162-133.mnet-online.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [62.245.162.133]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 08 Aug 2005 00:34:08 +0200
X-Authenticated: #686195
Received: from mbanck by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1E1tih-0006Kt-Ji
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:34:15 +0200
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:34:15 +0200
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on libcairo0.5.1-dev
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050807223415.GB4586@chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-3
Severity: serious

Hello,

there was a problem autobuilding your package:

Automatic build of gcc-4.0_4.0.1-3 on nighthawk by sbuild/i386 1.7
Build started at 20050808-0022
******************************************************************************
Checking available source versions...
Fetching source files...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Need to get 32.4MB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main gcc-4.0 4.0.1-3 (dsc)
[3574B]
Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main gcc-4.0 4.0.1-3 (tar)
[31.7MB]
Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main gcc-4.0 4.0.1-3 (diff)
[722kB]
Fetched 32.4MB in 1m43s (313kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.9), libc6.1-dev (>= 2.3.2.ds1-16)
[alpha ia64] | libc0.3-dev (>= 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc0.1-dev (>=
2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc12-dev (>= 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc6-dev (>=
2.3.2.ds1-21) [hppa] | libc6-dev (>= 2.3.2.ds1-16) [!hppa],
libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], libc6-dev-s390x [s390], ia32-libs-dev [amd64]
| libc6-dev-i386 [amd64], libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64], amd64-libs-dev (>=
1.2) [i386], libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) [ia64], libatomic-ops-dev
[ia64], m4, autoconf, automake1.9, libtool, autogen, gawk, dejagnu (>=
1.4.3) [!hurd-any !hurd-i386], expect-tcl8.3 [hppa] | expect [hppa],
expect (>= 5.38.0) [!hppa !hurd-any !hurd-i386], bzip2, binutils (>=
2.16.1) | binutils-multiarch (>= 2.16.1), binutils-hppa64 (>= 2.16.1)
[hppa], debhelper (>= 4.1), gperf (>= 3.0.1), bison (>= 1:1.875a-1),
flex, gettext, texinfo (>= 4.3), zlib1g-dev, libgc-dev [!avr !alpha
!amd64 !arm !hppa !i386 !ia64 !m68k !mips !mipsel !powerpc !s390 !sparc
!knetbsd-any !knetbsd-i386], xlibs-dev, gnat-4.0 [!alpha !arm !m68k !sh3
!sh3eb !sh4 !sh4eb !kfreebsd-any !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !kfreebsd-i386
!knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386] | gnat-3.3 [!alpha !arm !m68k !sh3 !sh3eb
!sh4 !sh4eb !kfreebsd-any !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !kfreebsd-i386
!knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386] | gnat-3.4 [!alpha !arm !m68k !sh3 !sh3eb
!sh4 !sh4eb !kfreebsd-any !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !kfreebsd-i386
!knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libncurses5-dev [!netbsd-any !netbsd-i386],
libmpfr-dev [!m68k !avr], tetex-bin [!netbsd-any !netbsd-i386], locales
[!hurd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386 !hurd-any !knetbsd-any
!netbsd-any], procps [!hurd-any !hurd-i386], help2man [!netbsd-any
!netbsd-i386], sharutils, libgtk2.0-dev [!mips !mipsel !knetbsd-any
!netbsd-any !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libart-2.0-dev [!mips !mipsel
!knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libcairo0.5.1-dev
[!mips !mipsel !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386] |
libcairo1-dev (>= 0.5.2) [!mips !mipsel !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any
!knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], realpath (>= 1.9.12), chrpath, lsb-release,
dash [hppa]
Build-Depends-Indep: doxygen (>= 1.4.2), graphviz (>= 2.2)
Checking for already installed source dependencies...
[...]
Checking for source dependency conflicts...
  /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
amd64-libs-dev m4 autoconf automake1.9 libtool autogen gawk dejagnu
expect gperf bison flex texinfo zlib1g-dev xlibs-dev gnat-4.0
libncurses5-dev libmpfr-dev tetex-bin locales procps help2man sharutils
libgtk2.0-dev libart-2.0-dev libcairo0.5.1-dev realpath chrpath
lsb-release
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Package libcairo0.5.1-dev has no installation candidate
Package libcairo0.5.1-dev is not available, but is referred to by
another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
apt-get failed.
Package installation failed

The Build-Depends need to be updated to libcairo0.6.0-dev, it seems.


Michael

-- 
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321883-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 00:13:11 +0000
>From mbanck@gmx.net Sun Aug 07 17:13:11 2005
Return-path: <mbanck@gmx.net>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E1vGQ-00023I-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:13:11 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Aug 2005 00:12:39 -0000
Received: from ppp-62-245-162-133.mnet-online.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [62.245.162.133]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 08 Aug 2005 02:12:39 +0200
X-Authenticated: #686195
Received: from mbanck by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1E1vG2-00013d-C9
	for 321883-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:12:46 +0200
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 02:12:46 +0200
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
To: 321883-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#321883: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on libcairo0.5.1-dev
Message-ID: <20050808001246.GE4586@chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
References: <[🔎] 20050807223415.GB4586@chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 17142.40671.437229.210783@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 17142.40671.437229.210783@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: 321883-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:53:03AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Michael Banck writes:
> > Package: gcc-4.0
> > Version: 4.0.1-3
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> would you mind checking the BTS before submitting duplicates?

Sorry about that.  I did check the BTS, but apparently not careful
enough (I carefully looked for bugs against gcc-4.0 and of severity
serious; I also looked over the complete bug list for all gcc-4.0
packages, but that bug escaped me for some reason).


cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html



Reply to: