[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#248207: marked as done ([fixed in 3.3-hammer, 3.5] inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64)



Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200
with message-id <20050522122015.GA25875@roeckx.be>
and subject line inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 20:29:02 +0000
>From Q@ping.be Sun May 09 13:29:02 2004
Return-path: <Q@ping.be>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BMuv0-0008Hv-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 13:29:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 47B652B41BA
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun,  9 May 2004 22:29:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238])
	by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381BE2B425D
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun,  9 May 2004 22:29:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 7A7F1158AD5; Sun, 09 May 2004 22:28:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 22:28:59 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64.
Message-ID: <20040509202859.GA14694@ping.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: Q@ping.be
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 3.3.3-6

Some package fail to build on amd64 with this error:
/usr/include/c++/3.3/x86_64-linux/bits/atomicity.h:40: error: inconsistent
   operand constraints in an `asm'


Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248207-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 12:20:23 +0000
>From kurt@roeckx.be Sun May 22 05:20:23 2005
Return-path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DZpRP-0001A4-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 05:20:23 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id ED66C19814E
	for <248207-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
	by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C0D198105
	for <248207-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id A00C326136; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: 248207-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64.
Message-ID: <20050522122015.GA25875@roeckx.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: 248207-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This seems to have been fixed, so I'm closing this.


Kurt



Reply to: