[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#307111: marked as done (gcc-4.0: Missing lsb-release build dependency)



Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2005 19:46:13 +0200
with message-id <17014.26469.924135.500896@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#307111: gcc-4.0: Missing lsb-release build dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2005 20:52:10 +0000
>From rleigh@debian.org Sat Apr 30 13:52:10 2005
Return-path: <rleigh@debian.org>
Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DRywc-0000w2-00; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:52:10 -0700
Received: from localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 19BC4E6DB7; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:52:01 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 19607-18; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:52:01 +0100 (BST)
Received: from hardknott.whinlatter.ukfsn.org (dsl-80-41-10-36.access.as9105.com [80.41.10.36])
	by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE3ECE6DB5; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:52:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rleigh by hardknott.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRyw9-0002HN-Kv; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:51:41 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gcc-4.0: Missing lsb-release build dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:51:41 +0100
Message-Id: <E1DRyw9-0002HN-Kv@hardknott.whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Justification: no longer builds from source

rleigh@hardknott:/tmp/gccbuild/gcc-4.0-4.0.0$ time debuild -uc -us
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gcc-4.0
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 4.0.0-1
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is powerpc
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
 /bin/bash: lsb_release: command not found
 rm -rf stamps
 rm -rf gcc-4.0.0 gpc-20030830 p
 /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules2 clean
 /bin/bash: lsb_release: command not found

lsb_release is missing.  The lsb-release package might need adding
to the Build-Depends.


Regards,
Roger


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307111-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 17:46:18 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Mon May 02 10:46:18 2005
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DSezq-0007ZJ-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 10:46:18 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29141;
	Mon, 2 May 2005 19:46:16 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E19F29D;
	Mon,  2 May 2005 19:46:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 25146-33; Mon,  2 May 2005 19:46:14 +0200 (MEST) 11292
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Mon,  2 May 2005 19:46:14 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j42HkEJN019534;
	Mon, 2 May 2005 19:46:14 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17014.26469.924135.500896@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 19:46:13 +0200
To: Roger Leigh <rleigh@debian.org>, 307111-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#307111: gcc-4.0: Missing lsb-release build dependency
In-Reply-To: <E1DRyw9-0002HN-Kv@hardknott.whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
References: <E1DRyw9-0002HN-Kv@hardknott.whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: 307111-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Look at the build dependencies, lsb-release is there.

Roger Leigh writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> 
> rleigh@hardknott:/tmp/gccbuild/gcc-4.0-4.0.0$ time debuild -uc -us
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gcc-4.0
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 4.0.0-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is powerpc
>  fakeroot debian/rules clean
>  /bin/bash: lsb_release: command not found
>  rm -rf stamps
>  rm -rf gcc-4.0.0 gpc-20030830 p
>  /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules2 clean
>  /bin/bash: lsb_release: command not found
> 
> lsb_release is missing.  The lsb-release package might need adding
> to the Build-Depends.



Reply to: