[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#284667: marked as done (gfortran not in gcc-snapshot)



Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:45:23 +0100
with message-id <16911.8627.700511.800803@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line fixed in gcc-snapshot_20050212-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2004 21:08:50 +0000
>From tow21@cam.ac.uk Tue Dec 07 13:08:49 2004
Return-path: <tow21@cam.ac.uk>
Received: from rock.esc.cam.ac.uk [131.111.41.250] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CbmZl-00072I-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:08:49 -0800
Received: from parabrisas.esc.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.44.165] ident=Debian-exim)
	by rock.esc.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CbmZi-0006GS-Ty; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:08:48 +0000
Received: from tow by parabrisas.esc.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CbmZi-0007lH-RC; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:08:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: tow21@cam.ac.uk
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gfortran not in gcc-snapshot
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:08:46 +0000
Message-Id: <E1CbmZi-0007lH-RC@parabrisas.esc.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: <tow21@cam.ac.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20041030-1
Severity: normal


gcc-snapshot of 20040704 included gfortran; I've just upgraded to 
20041030, and gfortran is no longer there. Given that gfortran is 
one of the more high-profile developments in gcc-4.0.0, it would seem
important to include it.

Toby


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB)

Versions of packages gcc-snapshot depends on:
ii  binutils                    2.15-5       The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  libart-2.0-2                2.3.16-6     Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0                 1.8.0-3      The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0                2.4.7-1      The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0                 2.4.13-1     The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0               1.6.0-3      Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.2-3    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 284667-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 09:45:28 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sun Feb 13 01:45:28 2005
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D0GJk-0007vI-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:45:28 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17815;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:45:26 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4C3F215;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:45:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 12752-15; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:45:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:45:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j1D9jND5007014;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:45:23 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16911.8627.700511.800803@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:45:23 +0100
To: 284667-done@bugs.debian.org, 288152-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in gcc-snapshot_20050212-1
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: 284667-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

fixed in gcc-snapshot_20050212-1



Reply to: