[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Results for 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu



LAST_UPDATED: Fri Dec 31 22:11:04 UTC 2004

Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-9.C  (test for warnings, line 32)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/externc-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/externc-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/externc-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/static-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/static-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/static-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/uninst.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/uninst.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/uninst.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		10448
# of unexpected failures	21
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		71
# of untested testcases		21
# of unsupported tests		89
/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++  version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental)

		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die7.c scan-assembler 1.*DW_AT_inline
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-65.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 2 loops 1

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		31987
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		93
# of untested testcases		28
# of unsupported tests		474
/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental)

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		1528
# of unsupported tests		10
/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental)

		=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes		216
# of unsupported tests		2
		=== libjava tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: Thread_HoldsLock execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Thread_HoldsLock execution - gij test
FAIL: Thread_HoldsLock execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Thread_HoldsLock -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Thread_HoldsLock execution - gij test
FAIL: Thread_HoldsLock -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
XPASS: pr13107_3 compilation from bytecode
XPASS: pr13107_3 -O3 compilation from bytecode
FAIL: pr16789 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: pr16789 execution - gij test
FAIL: pr16789 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: pr16789 -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: pr16789 execution - gij test
FAIL: pr16789 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test

		=== libjava Summary ===

# of expected passes		3682
# of unexpected failures	12
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		12
# of untested testcases		24
		=== libmudflap tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass54-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass54-frag.c (-static) execution test

		=== libmudflap Summary ===

# of expected passes		1242
# of unexpected failures	2

		=== libstdc++-v3 check-abi Summary ===

# of added symbols:		 63
# of missing symbols:		 0
# of incompatible symbols:	 0

using: /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/src/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt

		=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc execution test
FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/complex_value.cc execution test
FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/pow.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/enc_filebuf/char/13189.cc (test for excess errors)
WARNING: ext/enc_filebuf/char/13189.cc compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: ext/enc_filebuf/wchar_t/13189.cc (test for excess errors)
WARNING: ext/enc_filebuf/wchar_t/13189.cc compilation failed to produce executable

		=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		3348
# of unexpected failures	6
# of expected failures		7

Compiler version: 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) 
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: -v --prefix=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --enable-threads=posix --without-included-gettext --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk sparc-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,c++,java,objc
BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 


Build Dependencies:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  binutils       2.15-5         The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
ii  libc6-dev      2.3.2.ds1-20   GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea


Patches that Debian applied in this version:

boehm-gc-nocheck:
  Disable the boehm-gc testsuite. Hangs forever on this architecture

amd64-specs:
  Use 64bits mode assembly except with -m32

libjava-mips:
  libjava-mips patch from Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>

pr19162:
  PR1962

boehm-gc-nocheck:
  Disable the boehm-gc testsuite. Hangs forever on this architecture



Reply to: