Bug#283031: marked as done (libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:24:19 -0800
with message-id <20050102072416.GA8203@mauritius.dodds.net>
and subject line libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 03:49:02 +0000
>From buildd@caballero.debian.org Thu Nov 25 19:49:02 2004
Return-path: <buildd@caballero.debian.org>
Received: from caballero.debian.org [193.201.200.200]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CXX6U-0001un-00; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:49:02 -0800
Received: from buildd by caballero.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CXX6S-00033l-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:49:00 +0000
From: Debian/IA64 non-US Build Daemon <buildd@caballero.debian.org>
Subject: libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <E1CXX6S-00033l-00@caballero.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:49:00 +0000
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libgcc1
Version: 1:3.0.4-7
Severity: grave
After upgrading libgcc1 (to 3.4.3-1), apt fails to run, missing shared
library libunwind.so.7. Installing libunwind7 fixes the problem.
-- System Information
Kernel Version: Linux caballero 2.4.25-dsa-mckinley-smp #1 SMP Fri May 7 21:26:19 MDT 2004 ia64 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283031-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2005 07:24:20 +0000
>From vorlon@debian.org Sat Jan 01 23:24:20 2005
Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cl068-0005O1-00; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 23:24:20 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E8AD51720C5; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:24:19 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: 283031-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things
Message-ID: <20050102072416.GA8203@mauritius.dodds.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 283031-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm not sure this bug was ever actually present in sarge; in any case, it's
definitely fixed now as the new versions of libunwind and gcc-3.4 have
reached testing. =20
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB16GgKN6ufymYLloRAs03AKCU1ioEQ7WfMTy7u7L1MNOswAXfCQCg0Gt5
zepH4C7zotwdhtlsgXh0nwU=
=TlTc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--
Reply to: