Bug#255495: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:54:31 +0200
with message-id <16599.26407.502914.155122@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#255495: gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2004 12:23:53 +0000
>From Daniel.Bonniot@inria.fr Mon Jun 21 05:23:53 2004
Return-path: <Daniel.Bonniot@inria.fr>
Received: from fe03.axelero.hu (darmachakra.axelero.hu) [195.228.240.91]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BcNq5-0003Wg-00; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:23:53 -0700
Received: from darmachakra (localhost-02 [127.0.2.1])
by darmachakra.axelero.hu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5LCNphQ039173;
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:23:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fe03.axelero.hu [127.0.2.1] via SMTP gateway
by darmachakra [195.228.240.91]; id A0990293450
at Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:23:51 +0200
Received: from localhost (239.75-182-adsl-pool.axelero.hu [81.182.75.239])
by fe03.axelero.hu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5LCNo2Q039162;
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:23:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from daniel by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BcNqI-0001Qi-N9; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:24:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: daniel <bonniot@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:24:06 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1BcNqI-0001Qi-N9@localhost>
Sender: daniel <Daniel.Bonniot@inria.fr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20040613-1
Severity: wishlist
Since this snapshot is especially usefull for debugging recent versions
of gcc, it would seem to me a good idea not to strip the executables,
but to keep as much debugging symbols as possible. Is there a compelling
reason not to do this?
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gcc-snapshot depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.7-8 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libatk1.0-0 1.6.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.2-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgmp3 4.1.3-1 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.2-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpango1.0-0 1.4.0-4 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255495-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2004 22:54:40 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Mon Jun 21 15:54:40 2004
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BcXgW-00059j-00; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:54:40 -0700
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19821;
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:54:31 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i5LMsVQK023471;
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:54:31 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16599.26407.502914.155122@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:54:31 +0200
To: daniel <bonniot@users.sourceforge.net>, 255495-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#255495: gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1BcNqI-0001Qi-N9@localhost>
References: <[🔎] E1BcNqI-0001Qi-N9@localhost>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 255495-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
daniel writes:
> Package: gcc-snapshot
> Version: 20040613-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Since this snapshot is especially usefull for debugging recent versions
> of gcc, it would seem to me a good idea not to strip the executables,
> but to keep as much debugging symbols as possible. Is there a compelling
> reason not to do this?
yes, space & bandwidth. the packages get 100%-200% bigger. and if you
really want to debug gcc, you need the source and you build it
yourself. gcc-snapshot is intended to check for bugs in development
versions of gcc, such that package maintainers can have it installed
on different architectures.
+wontfix
Reply to: