[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255100: marked as done (quantlib FTBFS on amd64: files not found.)



Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:25 +0100
with message-id <16800.38545.508502.760542@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#255100: quantlib FTBFS on amd64: files not found.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:32:41 +0000
>From Q@ping.be Fri Jun 18 12:32:41 2004
Return-path: <Q@ping.be>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BbP6P-0001Sr-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:32:41 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id BAEAE2B404D
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:32:39 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5E08CEF.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.140.239])
	by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85F32B419F
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:32:39 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 1FDE0158AD5; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:32:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:32:38 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: quantlib FTBFS on amd64: files not found.
Message-ID: <20040618193238.GA16083@ping.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: Q@ping.be
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: quantlib
Version: 0.3.6.rc.20040611-1
Severity: important

The build on amd64 fails like this:
dh_installman   -plibquantlib0-dev debian/quantlib-test-suite.1
dh_movefiles    -plibquantlib0-dev --sourcedir=debian/libquantlib0
dh_movefiles: debian/libquantlib0/usr/bin/quantlib-config not
found (supposed to put it in libquantlib0-dev)
dh_movefiles: debian/libquantlib0/usr/bin/quantlib-test-suite not
found (supposed to put it in libquantlib0-dev)
make[1]: *** [install-work] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/quantlib-0.3.6.rc.20040611'
make: *** [install-stamp] Error 2

There is a quantlib-config in the top source dir but I can't find
quantlib-test-suite at all.



Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255100-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2004 13:22:31 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sun Nov 21 05:22:31 2004
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CVrfj-0000Mb-00; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 05:22:31 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21299;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F24F21A;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 10325-32; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:26 +0100 (MET)
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id iALDMPYL026660;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:25 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16800.38545.508502.760542@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:25 +0100
To: Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>
Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>, 255100-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#255100: quantlib FTBFS on amd64: files not found.
In-Reply-To: <20040619154627.GA18654@ping.be>
References: <20040618204937.GA16321@ping.be>
	<20040618210453.GA16764@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
	<20040619131103.GA18167@ping.be>
	<20040619133524.GA25628@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
	<20040619134240.GA18278@ping.be>
	<20040619134837.GA25798@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
	<20040619135622.GA18357@ping.be>
	<20040619145802.GA26565@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
	<16596.22871.737983.404030@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<20040619152449.GA26913@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
	<20040619154627.GA18654@ping.be>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: 255100-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:24:49AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:18:47PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > ??? Was macht denn der Titel fuer einen Sinn, nachdem Ihr den Report
> > > an gcc verwiesen habt ??? Wo ist der preprocessed source ??? Bin ich
> > > im Kindergarten ??? Not amused.
> > 
> > Slowly, slowely, I'll try to help with the source as I can but I cannot
> > proprocess _on the failing arch_ but Kurt can probably help.
> 
> This was build using g++-3.3 version 3.3.4-1.
> 
> Preprocessed file is attached.

seems to be fixed in gcc-3.3.5.



Reply to: