[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#277129: marked as done (gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-13 FTBFS due to missing build-dep on realpath)



Your message dated Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:54:42 +0200
with message-id <16756.11666.413859.914426@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#277129: gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-13 FTBFS due to missing build-dep on realpath
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 18:17:51 +0000
>From root@ruggedcom.com Mon Oct 18 11:17:51 2004
Return-path: <root@ruggedcom.com>
Received: from tomts23-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.185] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CJc4t-0004NQ-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:17:51 -0700
Received: from rcserver1.ruggedcom.local ([67.69.26.42])
          by tomts23-srv.bellnexxia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
          id <20041018181744.WHWM1698.tomts23-srv.bellnexxia.net@rcserver1.ruggedcom.local>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:17:44 -0400
Received: from debdev1.ruggedcom.com ([10.0.0.213] unverified) by rcserver1.ruggedcom.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:17:43 -0400
Received: from root by debdev1.ruggedcom.com with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CJc4t-0007Gh-27; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:17:51 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Len Sorensen <lennartsorensen@ruggedcom.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-13 FTBFS due to missing build-dep on realpath
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:17:50 -0400
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1CJc4t-0007Gh-27@debdev1.ruggedcom.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2004 18:17:43.0576 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2E76180:01C4B53E]
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-13
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

I was trying to build a gcc-3.3.4 cross compiler for arm, but my build
failed with a missing 'realpath' command, which seems to be provided by
the package 'realpath'.  Should gcc-3.3 source build-dep on realpath by
any chance or is this simply a cross compiler build issue?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
ii  binutils                    2.15-4       The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-3.3                     1:3.3.4-13   The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-3.3-base                1:3.3.4-13   The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.4.2-2    GCC support library

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277129-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 20:54:47 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Mon Oct 18 13:54:47 2004
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CJeWl-0004H8-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:54:47 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA19010;
	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:54:45 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A00F20D;
	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:54:44 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 29773-27; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:54:43 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:54:42 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i9IKsg9I006666;
	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:54:42 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16756.11666.413859.914426@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:54:42 +0200
To: Len Sorensen <lennartsorensen@ruggedcom.com>, 277129-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#277129: gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-13 FTBFS due to missing build-dep on realpath
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1CJc4t-0007Gh-27@debdev1.ruggedcom.com>
References: <[🔎] E1CJc4t-0007Gh-27@debdev1.ruggedcom.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: 277129-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Len Sorensen writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.4-13
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> 
> I was trying to build a gcc-3.3.4 cross compiler for arm, but my build
> failed with a missing 'realpath' command, which seems to be provided by
> the package 'realpath'.  Should gcc-3.3 source build-dep on realpath by
> any chance or is this simply a cross compiler build issue?

it's a cross compiler issue only, not release critical and fixed in
3.3.5-1.



Reply to: