Bug#273004: Minor kbsd-gnu fixes
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
I'm attaching a few minor kbsd-gnu fixes for rules.defs:
- Enable java for kfreebsd-gnu
- Enable ffi for kfreebsd-gnu and knetbsd-gnu
- Enable checks for kfreebsd-gnu and knetbsd-gnu
- Fix typo I introduced in one of my previous patches
(s/netbsd-elf-gnu/netbsdelf-gnu/g)
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i386)
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.2.1-6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
diff -ur gcc-4.0-4.0.old/debian/rules.defs gcc-4.0-4.0/debian/rules.defs
--- gcc-4.0-4.0.old/debian/rules.defs 2004-09-23 13:10:05.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc-4.0-4.0/debian/rules.defs 2004-09-23 13:17:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
with_java := yes
endif
-java_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsd-elf-gnu
+java_no_systems := hurd-i386 knetbsd-gnu netbsdelf-gnu
ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM),$(java_no_systems)))
with_java := disabled for $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM)
endif
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
ifeq ($(with_common_libs),yes)
with_libffi := yes
no_ffi_cpus :=
- no_ffi_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsd-elf-gnu
+ no_ffi_systems := hurd-i386 netbsdelf-gnu
ifneq ($(with_java),yes)
ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU),$(no_ffi_cpus)))
with_libffi := disabled for architecure $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU)
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@
with_libgnat := yes
ada_no_cpus := arm m68k
-ada_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsd-elf-gnu
+ada_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsdelf-gnu
ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU),$(ada_no_cpus)))
with_ada := disabled for architecure $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU)
endif
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@
ifdef DEB_CROSS
with_check := disabled for cross compiler package
endif
-check_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu
+check_no_systems := hurd-i386
ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM),$(check_no_systems)))
with_check := disabled for $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM)
endif
Reply to: