Bug#247791: marked as done (libgcj4: want library split into graphics and non-graphics parts)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:47:20 +0200
with message-id <16642.37528.678049.826661@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#247791: libgcj4: want library split into graphics and non-graphics parts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2004 03:59:57 +0000
>From john@jvb.vm.bytemark.co.uk Thu May 06 20:59:57 2004
Return-path: <john@jvb.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
Received: from memebeam.org (jvb.vm.bytemark.co.uk) [212.13.199.71]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLwWj-0001U3-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 20:59:57 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(uid 1001)
by jvb.vm.bytemark.co.uk with local; Thu, 06 May 2004 23:59:56 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "John V. Belmonte" <jbelmonte@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libgcj4: want library split into graphics and non-graphics parts
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 23:59:56 -0400
Message-ID: <courier.409B09BC.00002423@jvb.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: libgcj4
Version: 1:3.3.3-6
Severity: wishlist
When installing a command-line tool (trang) on a headless server, I was
suprised to learn it brought in X dependencies. If there is some
way to split the X dependent portion of the gcj runtime into another
library, it would be useful.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 247791-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2004 16:47:23 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Jul 24 09:47:23 2004
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BoPgA-0006mI-00; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:47:22 -0700
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA26136
for <247791-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:47:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i6OGlK5s004093;
Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:47:20 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16642.37528.678049.826661@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:47:20 +0200
To: 247791-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#247791: libgcj4: want library split into graphics and non-graphics parts
In-Reply-To: <courier.409B09BC.00002423@jvb.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
References: <courier.409B09BC.00002423@jvb.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 247791-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
John V. Belmonte writes:
> Package: libgcj4
> Version: 1:3.3.3-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> When installing a command-line tool (trang) on a headless server, I was
> suprised to learn it brought in X dependencies. If there is some
> way to split the X dependent portion of the gcj runtime into another
> library, it would be useful.
fixed in 3.3.4-5
Reply to: