Bug#233393: acknowledged by developer (Re: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libgcj4)
- To: 233393@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#233393: acknowledged by developer (Re: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libgcj4)
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:43:07 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040426154307.GG15350@einval.com>
- Reply-to: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>, 233393@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <handler.233393.D233393.108288925432254.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
- References: <16523.37703.761451.80558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <E1AtHSa-0004uL-00@sledge.mossbank.org.uk> <handler.233393.D233393.108288925432254.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 03:48:13AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
>According to upstream (Michael Koch?) some byte compiled classes are
>OS dependent (not necessarily architecture dependent).
Hmmm. In that case then it should be moved from /usr/share then -
/usr/share is explicitly for arch/OS independent files, surely?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Is there anybody out there?
Attachment:
pgpXOu6G4fjPM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: