Bug#218710: It seems this issue is fixed?
reassign 218710 gnumeric
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:02:09AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:12:14 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I wasn't able to reproduce this issue you reported (FTBFS with gcc 2.95 in
> > dialog-simulation.c) using gcc 2.95.3 on NetBSD/sparc.
> I can still reproduce it with gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian
> prerelease) on i386:
> Given that you can build gnumeric with gcc 2.95.3 on NetBSD/sparc, it seems
> reasonable to assume the problem is in gcc, not gnumeric. I'll reassign
I found why the Debian package fails to compile with gcc 2.95, the
following patch fixes the problem:
--- debian/rules.old 2004-01-27 12:14:28.000000000 +0100
+++ debian/rules 2004-01-27 12:14:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@
- --enable-iso-c \
ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
After applying this patch and adding the small diff from Gnumeric
bug 131967  (already fixed in upstream cvs) Gnumeric compiles with
You might argue whether there's a bug in gc 2.95 with -ansi involved,
but since gcc 2.95 is a dead branch there's not much use in a bug
It's your choice whether you prefer to apply this patch or to leave this
bug as wontfix.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed