[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Bug target/13722] [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload



------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com  2004-01-22 22:17 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload

zack at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> The implication of what you are saying above is that you don't think
> anyone without access to an ia64-linux box should be allowed to touch
> the ia64 back end, which I think is bad policy.

This is one way to solve the problem, but not the only way.  I mention 
it because I think it is the most expedient.  Another solution would be 
for you to build an ia64-hpux Ada compiler.  Another solution is for you 
to voluntarily revert patches when it is discovered that they don't 
work.  Another solution is for you to ask for help testing patches 
before checking them in.

> to find problems - but my experience is that everyone ignores me when
> I ask for a second opinion on my patches, so I don't expect this to
> help much.

I don't ignore IA-64 backend patches, though I am sometimes a week or so 
behind on reading gcc-patches.  I wouldn't mind if you cc'ed me on IA-64 
backend patches so that I would see them sooner.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13722

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



Reply to: