Processed: Re: Bug#128993: [Bug libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Cc: Debian GCC maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>(gcc-3.2 #128993)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#128993: [Bug libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:52:10 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.107402673329790.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <16388.18728.28213.776861@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <16388.18728.28213.776861@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 128993 + fixed-upstream
Bug#128993: [PR libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> retitle 128993 [PR9073, fixed in 3.4] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?
Bug#128993: [PR libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#227518: g++-3.3: Doesn't find inherited inner class after template instantiation
Next by Date: Bug#223391: marked as done (gcc-3.2: Anonymous namespaces can sometimes still cause cross-object symbol conflicts)
Previous by thread: Bug#207516: marked as done ([PR 12158] [3.3 regression] [hppa] compilation does not terminate)
Next by thread: Bug#223391: marked as done (gcc-3.2: Anonymous namespaces can sometimes still cause cross-object symbol conflicts)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread