Bug#218859: marked as done (libstdc++5: dependency on libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-4 ?)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Nov 2003 20:56:48 -0500
with message-id <20031103015648.GA29064@nevyn.them.org>
and subject line Bug#218859: libstdc++5: dependency on libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-4 ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 01:28:39 +0000
>From duraid@octopus.com.au Sun Nov 02 19:28:38 2003
Return-path: <duraid@octopus.com.au>
Received: from ppp113-119.lns1.syd3.internode.on.net (freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au) [150.101.113.119]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AGTWI-0004qf-00; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:28:38 -0600
Received: from duraid by freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AGTWB-00052K-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:28:31 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libstdc++5: dependency on libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-4 ?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:28:31 +1100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1AGTWB-00052K-00@freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au>
Sender: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libstdc++5
Version: 1:3.3.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Why does this package now depend on version >= 2.3.2.ds1-4 of libc6.1? Isn't
2.3.2.<anything> good enough?
On ia64, libc6.1 >= 2.3.2-8 is broken (see bug 216466). So, I can hold this
back. Previously, that wasn't a problem. But many things depend on
libstdc++5, so now I'm a bit stuck.
Duraid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux freestyle 2.6.0-test8 #1 SMP Sun Oct 19 08:27:47 EST 2003 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libstdc++5 depends on:
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.2-2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
hi libc6.1 2.3.2-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-1 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 218859-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 01:56:50 +0000
>From drow@crack.them.org Sun Nov 02 19:56:49 2003
Return-path: <drow@crack.them.org>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AGTxZ-0000Bu-00; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:56:49 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian))
id 1AGTxY-0007ZA-Br; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 20:56:48 -0500
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 20:56:48 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>, 218859-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#218859: libstdc++5: dependency on libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-4 ?
Message-ID: <20031103015648.GA29064@nevyn.them.org>
References: <[🔎] E1AGTWB-00052K-00@freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1AGTWB-00052K-00@freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Delivered-To: 218859-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 12:28:31PM +1100, Duraid Madina wrote:
> Package: libstdc++5
> Version: 1:3.3.2-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
>
> Why does this package now depend on version >= 2.3.2.ds1-4 of libc6.1? Isn't
> 2.3.2.<anything> good enough?
Because new functions are added to later versions. That's what shlib
versioning is for, after all.
> On ia64, libc6.1 >= 2.3.2-8 is broken (see bug 216466). So, I can hold this
> back. Previously, that wasn't a problem. But many things depend on
> libstdc++5, so now I'm a bit stuck.
Aside from the broken JVM, no one else has been able to duplicate
these...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: