Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote on 19/07/2003 (11:23) :
> Preben Randhol <randhol@pvv.org> writes:
>
> > What do you mean? That it is a bad idea at the moment as nothing is
> > stable or that it is a bad idea whenever? I don't agree with the
> > latter.
>
> What do you propose? Upstream is still at the beginning of shared
> library support. They use rpath and have a very unusual versioning
> scheme (ldconfig complains about it). Upstream obviously doesn't
> expect that people move dynamically linked executables from one
> machine to the other.
I see I didn't know it wasn't supported yet. So when shared library
support is in place in gcc 3.x or 4.x, then one can have shared
libraries? What I was trying to say is that I hope one can eventually
have shared libraries so my Ada applications compiled with gcc does not
become 3 times bigger as they are with Gnat 3.14p or 3.15p. But it
sounded like somebody thought this was a bad idea at any time.
As for the debian package the symlinks should be removed so that one
doesn't get confused about why the so libs are missing.
Preben
--
Ada95 is good for you.
http://www.crystalcode.com/codemage/MainMenu/Coding/Ada/IntroducingAda.php
Reply to: