Hi Matthias,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> as I wrote on Fri, 23 May 2003 10:39:48 +0200, I am unable to
> reproduce this report. Is somebody else able to confirm this report?
I unfortunately rm'ed the patches I used for 1.0.3 to get it
built to this point with g++ 3.3 from my disk since we a) were about to
force gcc 3.2 for 1.0.3 anyways (alone because of #194345 ) and b) we are
working on 1.1rc now which is to be released in around a week...
Anyhow, I just took the .ii again and ran g++ -v -save-temps on it..
It printed out the errors but without the ICE (as you posted
in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=194186&msg=6.
So it seems it definitely was fixed or some other thing.
I cannot reproduce that now, too..
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
pgp_G6G7Pqh1X.pgp
Description: PGP signature