[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#195353: marked as done (java.net.SocketException: SO_REUSEADDR: not valid for TCP)



Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:21:53 +0200
with message-id <16105.42434.51822.971740@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#195353: java.net.SocketException: SO_REUSEADDR: not valid for TCP
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2003 04:33:31 +0000
>From doogie@debian.org Thu May 29 23:33:30 2003
Return-path: <doogie@debian.org>
Received: from 12-238-57-17.client.attbi.com (yakko.doogie.org) [12.238.57.17] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19Lba6-0008Gv-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 23:33:30 -0500
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (uucp)
	by yakko.doogie.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 19Lba5-0005CE-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 23:33:29 -0500
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 23:33:29 -0500 (CDT)
From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
X-X-Sender: adam@yakko.doogie.org
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: java.net.SocketException: SO_REUSEADDR: not valid for TCP
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305292329080.12043-100000@yakko.doogie.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.7 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_PINE
	autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

package: libgcj4
version: 1:3.3-2

java.net.SocketException: SO_REUSEADDR: not valid for TCP
   at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.setOption(int, java.lang.Object) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.4.0.0)
   at java.net.ServerSocket.setReuseAddress(boolean) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.4.0.0)
   at org.doogie.net.SuperServer.processServerSocket(java.net.InetSocketAddress, org.doogie.net.SuperServer$ServerSocketAdapter) (Unknown Source)
   at org.doogie.net.SuperServer.register(int, org.doogie.net.SuperServer$ServerSocketAdapter) (Unknown Source)
   at org.doogie.net.http.Server.main(java.lang.String[]) (Unknown Source)

It is perfectly fine to set that option for a tcp socket.  Setting it for
udp makes no sense.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195353-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2003 10:26:12 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Jun 13 05:26:11 2003
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19Qll5-0004zy-00; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 05:26:11 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28302
	for <195353-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:21:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h5DALsi18726;
	Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:21:54 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16105.42434.51822.971740@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:21:53 +0200
To: 195353-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#195353: java.net.SocketException: SO_REUSEADDR: not valid for TCP
In-Reply-To: <m3add5vti9.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305292329080.12043-100000@yakko.doogie.org>
	<m3add5vti9.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 195353-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-20.2 required=4.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_VM
	autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?= writes:
> Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > java.net.SocketException: SO_REUSEADDR: not valid for TCP
> [...]
> > It is perfectly fine to set that option for a tcp socket.  Setting it for
> > udp makes no sense.
> 
> Hmm. 
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/docs/api/java/net/SocketOptions.html#SO_REUSEADDR
> says
> 
> Sets SO_REUSEADDR for a socket. This is used only for MulticastSockets
> in java, and it is set by default for MulticastSockets.
> 
> Valid for: DatagramSocketImpl 

Closing the report.



Reply to: