Bug#153965: c/8602: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions
Not yet fixed in the 3.2 and 3.3 branches. Ok to checkin, if testsuite
doesn't show new regressions on the branches?
You write:
"This could be done better with the tree optimizers on tree-ssa
branch, as we won't have thrown away most of the line number
information yet."
Can we keep open this report, maybe at a lower priority?
rth@gcc.gnu.org writes:
> Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
> Responsible-Changed-By: rth
> Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 6 00:39:25 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> .
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
> State-Changed-By: rth
> State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 6 00:39:25 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg01914.html
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8602
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: