Bug#211909: marked as done (Java packages are not built on HPPA, MIPS, MIPSEL)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:37:43 -0700
with message-id <20030924153743.GA15245@cyberhqz.com>
and subject line nothing to do here
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 06:32:29 +0000
>From adamm@galacticasoftware.com Sun Sep 21 01:32:27 2003
Return-path: <adamm@galacticasoftware.com>
Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A0xlj-0004EX-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:32:27 -0500
Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com (mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com [192.168.53.2])
by polaris.galacticasoftware.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with SMTP id h8L6Qnps007952
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:26:49 -0500
Received: by mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:28:23 -0500
From: "Adam Majer" <adamm@galacticasoftware.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:28:23 -0500
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Missing libgcj-common on HPPA, MIPS, MIPSEL
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030921062823.GA25299@galacticasoftware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gcc-3.3
Severity: serious
*At least* libgcj-common seems to be missing from builds
on HPPA, Mips, Mipsel.
Package is listed as Arch: any
This breaks any package on those architectures that depend
on libgcj-common eg. classpath.
- Adam
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 211909-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2003 15:37:59 +0000
>From rmurray@cyberhqz.com Wed Sep 24 10:37:46 2003
Return-path: <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>
Received: from h24-77-96-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.77.96.253]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A2Bi4-00032F-00; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:37:44 -0500
Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com [192.168.0.2])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B332B5404E
for <211909-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5415A1B9664; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:37:43 -0700
From: Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
To: 211909-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: nothing to do here
Message-ID: <20030924153743.GA15245@cyberhqz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 211909-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=4.0
tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
> This is *NOT* the right way to fix this bug. You have to change the
> Architecture field to list only the supported archs.
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture
> So change all "any" for the java packages, to "i386 sparc m68k " etc...
The architecture line is for packages that _REALLY_ are arch specific,
not just "happens to be broken on this arch right now". Good examples
are boot loaders, and things that need an arch-specific piece of
hardware. Bad examples are almost everything else. When the port is
fixed, it makes it harder to test that it does indeed work with our
environment, if the architecture line is limited.
> Excuse for classpath
> * 28 days old (needed 10 days)
> * classpath/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: libgcj-common
> * classpath/mips unsatisfiable Depends: libgcj-common
> * classpath/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: libgcj-common
> * Valid candidate
> If you would set the Architecture field properly, then it could be
> set properly for the classpath package as well and it could actually
> go into testing.
No, setting the Architecture field has nothing to do with this. You should
talk to the porters involved, and ftp-master to possibly remove the old
packages.
Reply to: