Bug#211909: acknowledged by developer (these aren't built because they don't build)
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:51:03AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:00:11AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Adam Majer writes:
> > > Ok, but the arch specific java packages that do not build on hppa, mips, and mipsel
> > > need to have proper Architecture set.
> >
> > why? it doesn't hurt anybody.
>
> It does. For example, classpath.
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=classpath
>
> Excuse for classpath
>
> * 28 days old (needed 10 days)
> * classpath/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: libgcj-common
> * classpath/mips unsatisfiable Depends: libgcj-common
> * classpath/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: libgcj-common
> * Valid candidate
>
>
> If you would set the Architecture field properly, then it could be
> set properly for the classpath package as well and it could actually
> go into testing.
>
> When you make a decission to sudenly stop building on some archs,
> you should change the Architecture field accordingly. This is in the
> Policy 5.6.7
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture
In what way does the architecture for gcj affect the architecture for
classpath? Just set that.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: