Bug#196015: this is a problem of altgcc
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 08:16:19PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> So needed symbols are defined. The same for libc.so.
> This seems a problem of altgcc...
Are you sure about that? readelf on libc.so.5 tells a slightly
different story:
Relocation section '.rel.plt' at offset 0xf498 contains 503 entries:
Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name
00088580 00008e07 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 endnetgrent
0008869c 00017407 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 getnetgrent
00088948 0003a407 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 setnetgrent
Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 1681 entries:
Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
142: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND endnetgrent
372: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND getnetgrent
932: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND setnetgrent
The symbols are present but don't appear to be properly defined.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Reply to: