[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#196015: this is a problem of altgcc



On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 08:16:19PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:

> So needed symbols are defined. The same for libc.so.
> This seems a problem of altgcc...

Are you sure about that?  readelf on libc.so.5 tells a slightly
different story:

Relocation section '.rel.plt' at offset 0xf498 contains 503 entries:
 Offset     Info    Type            Sym.Value  Sym. Name
00088580  00008e07 R_386_JUMP_SLOT   00000000   endnetgrent
0008869c  00017407 R_386_JUMP_SLOT   00000000   getnetgrent
00088948  0003a407 R_386_JUMP_SLOT   00000000   setnetgrent

Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 1681 entries:
   Num:    Value  Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
   142: 00000000     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND endnetgrent
   372: 00000000     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND getnetgrent
   932: 00000000     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND setnetgrent

The symbols are present but don't appear to be properly defined.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."



Reply to: