[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#206715: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#206715: gcc fai ls to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section)




> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
> X-Sender: <zxmjz18@linux17.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
> To: <206715-done@bugs.debian.org>
> Subject: Re: Bug#206715: gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__
> __volatile__
>  section
> In-Reply-To:
> <[🔎] B22BD4F8D736D611B6240002A5FBD7D0047C65E1@tmav372a.tmav.ww011.siemens.net>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0308221407570.18155-100000@linux17.zdv.uni-
> tuebingen.de>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.4; AVE 6.21.0.1; VDF 6.21.0.26
> Delivered-To: 206715-done@bugs.debian.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0
> 	tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,USER_AGENT_PINE
> 	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
> (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
> 
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Petrisor Marian wrote:
> 
> > __asm__ __volatile__("
> > movl (%1), %0
> 
> 
> Multi-line string literals are not valid in C. Fix the code, or use a
> newer kernel version.
> 
> 	Falk
If multi-line string literals are not valid in C, why gcc 2.95 recognizes and correctly compiles this section?"



Reply to: