Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #201658 to gcc-gnats as PR 11931

To: doko@debian.org
Cc: debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org (#201658), Debian GCC maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>(gcc-3.3 #201658)
Subject: Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #201658 to gcc-gnats as PR 11931
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:33:13 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.106096838128268.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <E19niLA-0008PT-F7@tango.net.local>
References: <E19niLA-0008PT-F7@tango.net.local>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # submitted Debian report #201658 to gcc-gnats as PR 11931
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11931
> forwarded 201658 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11931
Bug#201658: gcc-3.3: unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11931.

> retitle 201658 [PR 11931] unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL
Bug#201658: gcc-3.3: unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL
Changed Bug title.

> tags 201658 + upstream
Bug#201658: [PR 11931] unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: default CPU target ix86 based ports
Next by Date: Bug#201691: marked as done (gnat-3.3: gnatchop don't use correct gcc)
Previous by thread: [Bug c++/11928] [3.3/3.4 regression] c++ typedef handling
Next by thread: Bug#201691: marked as done (gnat-3.3: gnatchop don't use correct gcc)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread