[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: default CPU target for ix86 based ports



Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
> i386 seems to die, sun4m also does have servere problems... Where does
> this lead to? All these seem to arise from doing optimization which
> hasn't been proved to (really) make things better... Everything I see is
> that it's breaking stuff.

the ix86 change was for _compatibility_ reasons, not for
_performance_.

maybe Ben can commit on the sparc change.



Reply to: