Bug#195369: gcc-3.3 seems to need a versioned build dependency on a doxygen
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: normal
Building gcc-3.3 on a woody system with some additional updates produces
the following messages:
<-- snip -->
...
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386
-linux/libstdc++-v3'
(srcdir=`cd ../../../src/libstdc++-v3; ${PWDCMD-pwd}`; \
builddir=`${PWDCMD-pwd}`; \
/bin/sh ../../../src/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/run_doxygen \
--mode=user ${srcdir} ${builddir})
:: NOTE that this may take some time...
/usr/bin/doxygen /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `HIDE_FRIEND_COMPOUNDS =' at line 96, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `HIDE_IN_BODY_DOCS =' at line 103, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `MULTILINE_CPP_IS_BRIEF =' at line 199, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `DETAILS_AT_TOP =' at line 206, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `GENERATE_DEPRECATEDLIST=' at line 260, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `WARN_IF_DOC_ERROR =' at line 333, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `CHM_FILE =' at line 557, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `HHC_LOCATION =' at line 564, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `XML_SCHEMA =' at line 766, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `XML_DTD =' at line 772, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `GENERATE_PERLMOD =' at line 796, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `PERLMOD_LATEX =' at line 802, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `PERLMOD_PRETTY =' at line 810, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
Warning: ignoring unsupported tag `PERLMOD_MAKEVAR_PREFIX =' at line 817, file /home/bunk/Pakete/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds9/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
sh: dot: command not found
Problems running dot. Check your installation!
...
<-- snip -->
It seems a versioned build dependency on doxygen is needed
(but hopefully no build dependency on graphviz).
Reply to: